Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 vs Intel Arctic Sound M

AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 vs Intel Arctic Sound M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI25 and 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 's Advantages
Boost Clock1500MHz
Lower TDP (300W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 436.2GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI25
12.29 TFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound M +20%
14.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Jan 2022
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1400 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
852 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM2
Memory Type
HBM2e
2048bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
436.2GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
8192
256
TMUs
256
64
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
384.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
24.58 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
12.29 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
500W
700 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
DG2-512
Vega 10 XT GL (215-0894124)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 5.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
6 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy