Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000

AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI25 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (436.2GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
3904 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI25 +2460%
12.29 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000
0.48 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Dec 2010
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1400 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
852 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
2048bit
Memory Bus
128bit
436.2GB/s
Bandwidth
41.60GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
4
4096
Shading Units
192
256
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
384.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
24.58 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.29 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
62W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
GF106
Vega 10 XT GL (215-0894124)
GPU Variant
GF106-875-KA-A1
GCN 5.0
Architecture
Fermi
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy