Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050

AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI25 and 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (436.2GB/s vs 144.0GB/s)
3648 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla C2050 's Advantages
Lower TDP (238W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI25 +1095%
12.29 TFLOPS
Tesla C2050
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Jul 2011
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1400 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
852 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
3GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
2048bit
Memory Bus
384bit
436.2GB/s
Bandwidth
144.0GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
4096
Shading Units
448
256
TMUs
56
64
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
384.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
24.58 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.29 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
238W
700 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
GF100
Vega 10 XT GL (215-0894124)
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
GCN 5.0
Architecture
Fermi
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy