Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 vs NVIDIA A10G

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 vs NVIDIA A10G

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 and 12GB VRAM A10G to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
More VRAM (128GB vs 12GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 600.2GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA A10G 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 1% (1710MHz vs 1700MHz)
Lower TDP (150W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250 +43%
45.26 TFLOPS
A10G
31.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Apr 2021
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
1320 MHz
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
1710 MHz
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
12GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
8192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
600.2GB/s

Render Config

208
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
72
13312
Shading Units
9216
832
TMUs
288
0
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
72
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
164.2 GPixel/s
1414 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
492.5 GTexel/s
362.1 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
31.52 TFLOPS
45.26 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.52 TFLOPS
45.26 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
985.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
150W
900 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
GA102
Aldebaran
GPU Variant
GA102-890-A1
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
6 nm
Process Size
8 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
Unknown
Die Size
628 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
N/A
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy