Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000D

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000D

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
13120 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250 +9329%
45.26 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000D
0.48 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Oct 2011
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
41.60GB/s

Render Config

208
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
4
13312
Shading Units
192
832
TMUs
32
0
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
1414 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
362.1 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
45.26 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
45.26 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
62W
900 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
GF106
Aldebaran
GPU Variant
GF106-875-KA-A1
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
Unknown
Die Size
238 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy