Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 570

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 570

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 570 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
13296 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 570 's Advantages
Lower TDP (38W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250 +155968%
45.26 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 570
0.029 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Sep 2007
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
DDR2
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

208
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
13312
Shading Units
16
832
TMUs
8
0
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.680 GPixel/s
1414 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.680 GTexel/s
362.1 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
45.26 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
29.44 GFLOPS
45.26 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

500W
TDP
38W
900 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
G84
Aldebaran
GPU Variant
-
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
80 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
Unknown
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
N/A
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy