Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 880M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
13264 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250 +38917%
45.26 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 880M
0.116 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Jan 2010
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
6
208
Compute Units
-
13312
Shading Units
48
832
TMUs
16
0
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
1414 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.800 GTexel/s
362.1 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
45.26 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
116.2 GFLOPS
45.26 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
GT216
Aldebaran
GPU Variant
N10P-GLM
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
Unknown
Die Size
100 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
35W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
N/A
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy