Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 117% (1700MHz vs 784MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
11968 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (108W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250 +2048%
45.26 TFLOPS
Quadro K4200
2.107 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Jul 2014
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
771 MHz
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
784 MHz
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s

Render Config

208
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
13312
Shading Units
1344
832
TMUs
112
0
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.95 GPixel/s
1414 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
87.81 GTexel/s
362.1 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
45.26 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.107 TFLOPS
45.26 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
87.81 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
108W
900 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
GK104
Aldebaran
GPU Variant
GK104-850-A2
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
Unknown
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy