Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 120% (1700MHz vs 771MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
11008 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250 +1173%
45.26 TFLOPS
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Jul 2014
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
667 MHz
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

208
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
13312
Shading Units
2304
832
TMUs
192
0
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
1414 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
362.1 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
45.26 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
45.26 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
150W
900 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
GK110B
Aldebaran
GPU Variant
-
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
Unknown
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy