Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 vs NVIDIA Quadro K620

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 vs NVIDIA Quadro K620

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K620 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 51% (1700MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
12928 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K620 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250 +5144%
45.26 TFLOPS
Quadro K620
0.863 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Jul 2014
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
1058 MHz
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
DDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

208
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
13312
Shading Units
384
832
TMUs
24
0
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
1414 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.98 GTexel/s
362.1 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
45.26 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
863.2 GFLOPS
45.26 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.98 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
45W
900 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
GM107
Aldebaran
GPU Variant
GM107-850-A2
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
Unknown
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy