Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 vs NVIDIA Quadro K620M

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 vs NVIDIA Quadro K620M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K620M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 51% (1700MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
12928 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K620M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250 +5144%
45.26 TFLOPS
Quadro K620M
0.863 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Mar 2015
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
1029 MHz
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
DDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

208
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
13312
Shading Units
384
832
TMUs
16
0
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.992 GPixel/s
1414 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.98 GTexel/s
362.1 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
45.26 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
863.2 GFLOPS
45.26 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.98 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
30W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
GM108
Aldebaran
GPU Variant
N15M-Q3
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy