Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 and 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 15% (1700MHz vs 1480MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 140.2GB/s)
12288 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250 +1393%
45.26 TFLOPS
Quadro P2000
3.031 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Feb 2017
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
1076 MHz
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
5GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
160bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
140.2GB/s

Render Config

208
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
8
13312
Shading Units
1024
832
TMUs
64
0
ROPs
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.20 GPixel/s
1414 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
94.72 GTexel/s
362.1 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
47.36 GFLOPS
45.26 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.031 TFLOPS
45.26 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
94.72 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
75W
900 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
GP106
Aldebaran
GPU Variant
GP106-875-A1
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
16 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
Unknown
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
N/A
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy