AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 2
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X and 2GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 22% (1700MHz vs 1395MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 672.0GB/s)
10496 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250X
+378%
47.87 TFLOPS
GRID RTX T10 2
9.999 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2021
Release Date
Jan 2020
Radeon Instinct
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
1065 MHz
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
128GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
8192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s
Render Config
220
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
56
14080
Shading Units
3584
880
TMUs
224
0
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.28 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.5 GTexel/s
383.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
20.00 TFLOPS
47.87 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.999 TFLOPS
47.87 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
312.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
150W
900 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Aldebaran
GPU Name
TU102
Aldebaran XT
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
12 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
Unknown
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
N/A
Shader Model
6.8
