Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA GRID M3 3020

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA GRID M3 3020

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X and 4GB VRAM GRID M3 3020 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 30% (1700MHz vs 1306MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 83.20GB/s)
13440 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250X +2763%
47.87 TFLOPS
GRID M3 3020
1.672 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
May 2016
Radeon Instinct
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
1033 MHz
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
1306 MHz
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
83.20GB/s

Render Config

220
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
14080
Shading Units
640
880
TMUs
40
0
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.90 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
52.24 GTexel/s
383.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
47.87 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.672 TFLOPS
47.87 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.24 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
Unknown
900 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
GM107
Aldebaran XT
GPU Variant
-
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
Unknown
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
N/A
Shader Model
6.7 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy