Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA Quadro 410

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA Quadro 410

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X and 512MB VRAM Quadro 410 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 14.26GB/s)
13888 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 410 's Advantages
Lower TDP (38W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250X +17564%
47.87 TFLOPS
Quadro 410
0.271 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Aug 2012
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
DDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
14.26GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
220
Compute Units
-
14080
Shading Units
192
880
TMUs
16
0
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.824 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.30 GTexel/s
383.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
47.87 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
271.1 GFLOPS
47.87 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
11.30 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
GK107
Aldebaran XT
GPU Variant
GK107-810-A2
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
Unknown
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
38W
900 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy