Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
14048 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250X +59737%
47.87 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Jun 2007
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

220
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
4
14080
Shading Units
32
880
TMUs
16
0
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
383.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
47.87 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
47.87 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

500W
TDP
50W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
G84
Aldebaran XT
GPU Variant
NB8P-GLM
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
80 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
Unknown
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
N/A
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy