Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
13696 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250X +6430%
47.87 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000D
0.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Mar 2013
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

220
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
14080
Shading Units
384
880
TMUs
32
0
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
383.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
47.87 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
47.87 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
51W
900 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
GK107
Aldebaran XT
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
Unknown
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy