Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X and 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)
13504 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250X +6257%
47.87 TFLOPS
Quadro K3000M
0.753 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Jun 2012
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
89.60GB/s

Render Config

220
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
14080
Shading Units
576
880
TMUs
48
0
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.848 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.39 GTexel/s
383.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
47.87 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
753.4 GFLOPS
47.87 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.39 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
75W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
GK104
Aldebaran XT
GPU Variant
N14E-Q1-A2
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
Unknown
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy