AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 64% (1700MHz vs 1036MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 88.13GB/s)
13056 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250X
+2155%
47.87 TFLOPS
Quadro M2200 Mobile
2.122 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2021
Release Date
Jan 2017
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
695 MHz
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
1036 MHz
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
1377 MHz
Memory
128GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
88.13GB/s
Render Config
220
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
14080
Shading Units
1024
880
TMUs
64
0
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.15 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.30 GTexel/s
383.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
47.87 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.122 TFLOPS
47.87 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
66.30 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
55W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Aldebaran
GPU Name
GM206
Aldebaran XT
GPU Variant
-
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
Unknown
Die Size
228 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
N/A
Shader Model
6.4
