Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA Quadro P600

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA Quadro P600

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X and 2GB VRAM Quadro P600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 9% (1700MHz vs 1557MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 64.13GB/s)
13696 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250X +3902%
47.87 TFLOPS
Quadro P600
1.196 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Feb 2017
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
1329 MHz
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
1557 MHz
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
64.13GB/s

Render Config

220
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
3
14080
Shading Units
384
880
TMUs
24
0
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.91 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.37 GTexel/s
383.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
18.68 GFLOPS
47.87 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1196 GFLOPS
47.87 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
37.37 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
40W
900 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
GP107
Aldebaran XT
GPU Variant
-
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
6 nm
Process Size
14 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
Unknown
Die Size
132 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
N/A
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy