AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 5% (1700MHz vs 1612MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
11520 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Lower TDP (60W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250X
+480%
47.87 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Embedded
8.253 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2021
Release Date
Unknown
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
1117 MHz
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
1612 MHz
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
128GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
220
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
20
14080
Shading Units
2560
880
TMUs
80
0
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.38 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.0 GTexel/s
383.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.253 TFLOPS
47.87 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.253 TFLOPS
47.87 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
129.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
60W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Aldebaran
GPU Name
GA107S
Aldebaran XT
GPU Variant
-
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
6 nm
Process Size
8 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
N/A
Shader Model
6.6
