Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI300 vs Intel Arctic Sound M

AMD Radeon Instinct MI300 vs Intel Arctic Sound M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI300 and 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI300 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 1229GB/s)
5888 additional rendering cores
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (500W vs 600W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI300 +224%
47.87 TFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound M
14.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2023
Release Date
Jan 2022
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM3
Memory Type
HBM2e
8192bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

220
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
14080
Shading Units
8192
880
TMUs
256
0
ROPs
128
880
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
383.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
47.87 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
47.87 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS

Board Design

600W
TDP
500W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

Aqua Vanjaram
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
-
-
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
6 nm
153 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy