Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI300 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M

AMD Radeon Instinct MI300 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI300 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 2800M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI300 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
13984 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 600W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI300 +16521%
47.87 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 2800M
0.288 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2023
Release Date
Dec 2009
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM3
Memory Type
GDDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

220
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
12
14080
Shading Units
96
880
TMUs
48
0
ROPs
16
880
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.80 GTexel/s
383.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
47.87 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
288.0 GFLOPS
47.87 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

600W
TDP
75W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Aqua Vanjaram
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
N10E-GLM
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
65 nm
153 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
N/A
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy