Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI300 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200

AMD Radeon Instinct MI300 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI300 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI300 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 51% (1700MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
13440 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (68W vs 600W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI300 +3226%
47.87 TFLOPS
Quadro K2200
1.439 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2023
Release Date
Jul 2014
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
1046 MHz
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM3
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
220
Compute Units
-
14080
Shading Units
640
880
TMUs
40
0
ROPs
16
880
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.96 GTexel/s
383.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
47.87 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1439 GFLOPS
47.87 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
44.96 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Aqua Vanjaram
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
-
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
153 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Board Design

600W
TDP
68W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy