Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI300X vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T

AMD Radeon Instinct MI300X vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 192GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI300X and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5171GB/s vs 1229GB/s)
13312 additional rendering cores
Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
Lower TDP (350W vs 750W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI300X +638%
81.72 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 1T
11.06 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2023
Release Date
Jan 2021
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2525 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

192GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM3
Memory Type
HBM2e
8192bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
5171GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
304
Compute Units
-
19456
Shading Units
6144
1216
TMUs
192
0
ROPs
96
1216
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
2554 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
172.8 GTexel/s
653.7 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
22.12 TFLOPS
81.72 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.06 TFLOPS
81.72 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.765 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Aqua Vanjaram
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
GPU Variant
-
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
5 nm
Process Size
10 nm
153 billion
Transistors
8 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Board Design

750W
TDP
350W
1150 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy