Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI300X vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000

AMD Radeon Instinct MI300X vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 192GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI300X and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5171GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
19072 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 750W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI300X +11048%
81.72 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000
0.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2023
Release Date
Mar 2013
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2525 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

192GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM3
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
5171GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
304
Compute Units
-
19456
Shading Units
384
1216
TMUs
32
0
ROPs
16
1216
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
2554 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
653.7 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
81.72 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
81.72 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Aqua Vanjaram
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
153 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

750W
TDP
51W
1150 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy