Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X vs ATI FirePro V4900

AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X vs ATI FirePro V4900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 288GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI325X and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (288GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
18976 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 750W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI325X +10540%
81.72 TFLOPS
FirePro V4900
0.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2024
Release Date
Nov 2011
Radeon Instinct(MIx)
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2525 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

288GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM3e
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
10.3TB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

304
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
19456
Shading Units
480
1216
TMUs
24
0
ROPs
8
1216
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
16 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.400 GPixel/s
2554 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
653.7 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
81.72 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
81.72 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

750W
TDP
75W
1150 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Aqua Vanjaram
GPU Name
Turks
-
GPU Variant
Turks XT GL
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
153 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
N/A
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy