Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X vs NVIDIA GeForce 210

AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X vs NVIDIA GeForce 210

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 288GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI325X and 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X 's Advantages
Released 15 years late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (288GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
19440 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 210 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 750W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI325X +209438%
81.72 TFLOPS
GeForce 210
0.039 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2024
Release Date
Oct 2009
Radeon Instinct(MIx)
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2525 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

288GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM3e
Memory Type
DDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
10.3TB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

304
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
19456
Shading Units
16
1216
TMUs
8
0
ROPs
4
1216
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
256 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
2554 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
653.7 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
81.72 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
81.72 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

750W
TDP
31W
1150 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Aqua Vanjaram
GPU Name
GT218
-
GPU Variant
GT218-300-A2
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
153 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
N/A
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy