Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000 SDI

AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000 SDI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 288GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI325X and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 4000 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X 's Advantages
Released 20 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (288GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
19456 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000 SDI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 750W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2024
Release Date
Apr 2004
Radeon Instinct(MIx)
Generation
Quadro FX Rankine
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2525 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

288GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM3e
Memory Type
GDDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
10.3TB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

304
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
19456
Shading Units
-
1216
TMUs
12
0
ROPs
8
1216
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
-
256 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
2554 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.100 GTexel/s
653.7 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
81.72 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
81.72 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

750W
TDP
150W
1150 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 4x SDI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Aqua Vanjaram
GPU Name
NV41
-
GPU Variant
NV41 GL
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
130 nm
153 billion
Transistors
0.19 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
225 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
N/A
OpenGL
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
N/A
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy