Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI50 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP

AMD Radeon Instinct MI50 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI50 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 LP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI50 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1746MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1020GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
3824 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (28W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI50 +30377%
13.41 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 380 LP
0.044 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2018
Release Date
Dec 2009
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1200 MHz
Base Clock
-
1746 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1020GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

60
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
3840
Shading Units
16
240
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

111.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
419.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.400 GTexel/s
26.82 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.41 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.00 GFLOPS
6.705 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
28W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Vega 20
GPU Name
GT218
Vega 20 GLXT
GPU Variant
GT218 GL
GCN 5.1
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
13.23 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
331 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy