Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI50 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M

AMD Radeon Instinct MI50 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI50 and 512MB VRAM Quadro NVS 320M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI50 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1746MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1020GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
3808 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI50 +18021%
13.41 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 320M
0.074 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2018
Release Date
Jun 2007
Radeon Instinct
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

1200 MHz
Base Clock
-
1746 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1020GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

60
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
4
3840
Shading Units
32
240
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

111.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.600 GPixel/s
419.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.200 GTexel/s
26.82 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.41 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
73.60 GFLOPS
6.705 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
20W
700 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Vega 20
GPU Name
G84
Vega 20 GLXT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 5.1
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
80 nm
13.23 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
331 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy