Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI50 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

AMD Radeon Instinct MI50 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI50 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI50 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1746MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1020GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
3456 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI50 +2244%
13.41 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2018
Release Date
Jun 2012
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1200 MHz
Base Clock
-
1746 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2
Memory Type
DDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1020GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

60
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
3840
Shading Units
384
240
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

111.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.960 GPixel/s
419.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.84 GTexel/s
26.82 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.41 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
572.2 GFLOPS
6.705 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
23.84 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
55W
700 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Vega 20
GPU Name
GK107
Vega 20 GLXT
GPU Variant
N14P-Q3-A2
GCN 5.1
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
13.23 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
331 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy