Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro 5300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE v2

AMD Radeon Pro 5300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE v2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5300 and 768MB VRAM GeForce GTX 460 SE v2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro 5300 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 81.60GB/s)
992 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (85W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro 5300 +463%
4.224 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 460 SE v2
0.749 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2020
Release Date
Nov 2010
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
768MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
81.60GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
1280
Shading Units
288
80
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
384 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

52.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.800 GPixel/s
132.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.20 GTexel/s
8.448 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.224 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
748.8 GFLOPS
264.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
62.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

85W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 14
GPU Name
GF114
Navi 14 PRO XE
GPU Variant
GF114-400-A1
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.4 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
158 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy