Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro 5300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM

AMD Radeon Pro 5300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5300 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 645 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro 5300 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 85W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro 5300 +345%
4.224 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 645 OEM
0.949 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2020
Release Date
Apr 2013
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
576
80
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

52.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.888 GPixel/s
132.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.55 GTexel/s
8.448 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.224 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
949.2 GFLOPS
264.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
39.55 GFLOPS

Board Design

85W
TDP
65W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 14
GPU Name
GK106
Navi 14 PRO XE
GPU Variant
GK106-200-A1
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.4 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
158 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy