Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro 5300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690

AMD Radeon Pro 5300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5300 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 690 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro 5300 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 62% (1650MHz vs 1019MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
Lower TDP (85W vs 300W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 's Advantages
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro 5300 +34%
4.224 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 690
3.13 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2020
Release Date
May 2012
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
915 MHz
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
1019 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
1536
80
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

52.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.61 GPixel/s
132.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
130.4 GTexel/s
8.448 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.224 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.130 TFLOPS
264.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
130.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

85W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 14
GPU Name
GK104
Navi 14 PRO XE
GPU Variant
GK104-355-A2
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.4 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
158 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy