Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro 5300 vs AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM

AMD Radeon Pro 5300 vs AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5300 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 350 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro 5300 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 57% (1650MHz vs 1050MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 85W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro 5300 +424%
4.224 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 350 OEM
0.806 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2020
Release Date
May 2015
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
384
80
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

52.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.400 GPixel/s
132.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
8.448 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.224 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
806.4 GFLOPS
264.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
50.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

85W
TDP
65W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 14
GPU Name
Oland
Navi 14 PRO XE
GPU Variant
Oland XT (215-0837000)
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.4 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
158 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy