Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro 5300 vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

AMD Radeon Pro 5300 vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5300 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro 5300 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 77% (1650MHz vs 930MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 85W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro 5300 +343%
4.224 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 255 OEM
0.952 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2020
Release Date
Dec 2013
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
930 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
512
80
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

52.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
132.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.76 GTexel/s
8.448 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.224 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
952.3 GFLOPS
264.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.52 GFLOPS

Board Design

85W
TDP
65W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 14
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Navi 14 PRO XE
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRX
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.4 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
158 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy