Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro 5300 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

AMD Radeon Pro 5300 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5300 and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 29% (2130MHz vs 1650MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 85W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro 5300
4.224 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +184%
12 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2020
Release Date
Feb 2024
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
1620 MHz
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
22
1280
Shading Units
2816
80
TMUs
88
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

52.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
132.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
8.448 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
4.224 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
264.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

85W
TDP
70W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 14
GPU Name
AD107
Navi 14 PRO XE
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
5 nm
6.4 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
158 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.5
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy