Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro 5300M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile

AMD Radeon Pro 5300M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5300M and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro 5300M 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 27% (1590MHz vs 1250MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro 5300M
3.2 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile +52%
4.884 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
Apr 2019
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
1455 MHz
1250 MHz
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
24
20
Compute Units
-
1280
Shading Units
1536
80
TMUs
96
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB

Theoretical Performance

40.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
76.32 GPixel/s
100.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
152.6 GTexel/s
6.400 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
9.769 TFLOPS
3.200 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.884 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
152.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Navi 14
GPU Name
TU116
Navi 14 PROA
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
12 nm
6.4 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
158 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Board Design

85W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.5
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy