Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro 5300M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250

AMD Radeon Pro 5300M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5300M and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro 5300M 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 20% (1250MHz vs 1038MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 85W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro 5300M +301%
3.2 TFLOPS
GeForce MX250
0.797 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
Unknown
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
937 MHz
1250 MHz
Boost Clock
1038 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
3
1280
Shading Units
384
80
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

40.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.61 GPixel/s
100.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.91 GTexel/s
6.400 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.46 GFLOPS
3.200 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
797.2 GFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
24.91 GFLOPS

Board Design

85W
TDP
10W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 14
GPU Name
GP108B
Navi 14 PROA
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
7 nm
Process Size
14 nm
6.4 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
158 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.5
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy