Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro 555X vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

AMD Radeon Pro 555X vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 555X and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2010MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 94.08GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro 555X
1.393 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation +638%
10.29 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2018
Release Date
Mar 2023
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2010 MHz
1470 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
94.08GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
20
12
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
2560
48
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB

Theoretical Performance

14.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.48 GPixel/s
43.54 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
160.8 GTexel/s
1393 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.29 TFLOPS
1393 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.29 TFLOPS
87.07 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
160.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Polaris 21
GPU Name
AD107
Polaris 21 PRO
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
5 nm
3 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
50W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.4
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy