Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro 560 vs AMD FirePro W6170M

AMD Radeon Pro 560 vs AMD FirePro W6170M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 560 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W6170M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro 560 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
128 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W6170M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 81.28GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro 560
1.858 TFLOPS
FirePro W6170M +6%
1.971 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2017
Release Date
Aug 2014
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
81.28GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
16
Compute Units
14
1024
Shading Units
896
64
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

14.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.60 GPixel/s
58.05 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
61.60 GTexel/s
1.858 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.858 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.971 TFLOPS
116.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
123.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Polaris 21
GPU Name
Emerald
Polaris 21 XT (215-0908004)
GPU Variant
Emerald XT GL (216-0857001)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy