Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro 560 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation

AMD Radeon Pro 560 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 560 and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2115MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 81.28GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro 560
1.858 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation +599%
12.99 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2017
Release Date
Mar 2023
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1635 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2115 MHz
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
81.28GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
1024
Shading Units
3072
64
TMUs
96
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
101.5 GPixel/s
58.05 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
203.0 GTexel/s
1.858 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.99 TFLOPS
1.858 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.99 TFLOPS
116.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
203.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Polaris 21
GPU Name
AD107
Polaris 21 XT (215-0908004)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
5 nm
3 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.4
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy