Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT vs AMD Radeon R7 240

AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT vs AMD Radeon R7 240

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5700 XT and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 92% (1499MHz vs 780MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
2240 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 130W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro 5700 XT +1438%
7.675 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 240
0.499 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2020
Release Date
Oct 2013
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1243 MHz
Base Clock
730 MHz
1499 MHz
Boost Clock
780 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
384.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

40
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
2560
Shading Units
320
160
TMUs
20
64
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

95.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.240 GPixel/s
239.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
15.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.675 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
499.2 GFLOPS
479.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

130W
TDP
30W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 10
GPU Name
Oland
Navi 10 XTA
GPU Variant
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
10.3 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
251 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy