Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro 575 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250

AMD Radeon Pro 575 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 575 and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro 575 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (217.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Boost Clock1038MHz
Lower TDP (10W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro 575 +463%
4.489 TFLOPS
GeForce MX250
0.797 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Unknown
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
937 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1038 MHz
1695 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
217.0GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
3
2048
Shading Units
384
128
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

35.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.61 GPixel/s
140.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.91 GTexel/s
4.489 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.46 GFLOPS
4.489 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
797.2 GFLOPS
280.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
24.91 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
10W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Polaris 20
GPU Name
GP108B
Polaris 20 XL (215-0910052)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Pascal
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
Samsung
14 nm
Process Size
14 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy