Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro 575 vs AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

AMD Radeon Pro 575 vs AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 575 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro 575 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (217.0GB/s vs 174.7GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro 575 +50%
4.489 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition
2.989 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
May 2015
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1695 MHz
Memory Clock
1365 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
217.0GB/s
Bandwidth
174.7GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
32
Compute Units
28
2048
Shading Units
1792
128
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

35.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.69 GPixel/s
140.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.41 GTexel/s
4.489 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.489 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.989 TFLOPS
280.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
373.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Polaris 20
GPU Name
Amethyst
Polaris 20 XL (215-0910052)
GPU Variant
Amethyst PRO (216-0872004)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
5 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy