AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs Intel Arc A350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 4GB VRAM Arc A350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
Lower TDP (25W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
+86%
5.728 TFLOPS
Arc A350
3.072 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2017
Release Date
Jan 2022
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s
Render Config
36
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
768
144
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.144 TFLOPS
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.072 TFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
25W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Ellesmere
GPU Name
DG2-128
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
6 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
