Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs ATI FirePro V4800

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs ATI FirePro V4800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
1904 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V4800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris +823%
5.728 TFLOPS
FirePro V4800
0.62 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2017
Release Date
Apr 2010
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
400
144
TMUs
20
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.200 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.50 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
620.0 GFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
69W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
Redwood
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
Redwood XT GL
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy