Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs AMD FirePro W4300

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs AMD FirePro W4300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris +301%
5.728 TFLOPS
FirePro W4300
1.428 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2017
Release Date
Dec 2015
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
768
144
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.64 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1428 GFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.28 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
50W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
Bonaire
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
Bonaire PRO GL
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy