Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 256MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2288 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris +19651%
5.728 TFLOPS
GeForce 8400 GS
0.029 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2017
Release Date
Apr 2007
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
2304
Shading Units
16
144
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.836 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.672 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
29.38 GFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
40W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
G86
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
G86-213-A2
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Tesla
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
80 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy